2012-07-10 Tuesday meeting
Attending: Carlos, Chris, Josh (notes), Liza, Mark, Melissa, Stick, Emma, Roger, Andrew, Will, Gus, Elwood (notes), Blazej, Jean-Marie, Scott
Agenda - 2:30pm Start
Attending: Carlos, Chris, Josh (notes), Liza, Mark, Melissa, Stick, Emma, Roger, Andrew, Will, Gus, Elwood (notes), Blazej, Jean-Marie, Scott
Accepting minutes from last meeting
Sprint Tickets/bugs / Release Update
Documentation
- Josh: lots of doc tickets
- Documentation bullet points
- Josh: list of things people may/may not be looking at, can we keep working from this or is it too ambiguous to handle
- Will: Looking at a few, going though, known limitations contains a lot of out of date pieces, adding anything to that from current release?
- Roger: added postgres limitations
- Will: anyone anything in particular?
- Josh: done?
- Will: FAQ, made a few edits, with suggestions
- Josh: anything marked off this list is for final review
- Will: list of pages, worry over some edited in a copy and left.
- Emma: pending review stage, edited in red, checked and happy turn orange.
- Blazej: after pending can only go public, accidental click can make it public
- Andrew: can maybe look at finding all those pending review
- Emma: monitoring recently changed things
Remaining critical items -- To be discussed. Remaining commits ASAP.
- Josh: 6 critical, 3 insight, 1 cmd line, 2 Melissa, 1 not filed (memory leak from Chris)
-
Jean-Marie: 3 PRs open, search problem, turn off functionality, bug found late, single group search.
- Batch annotate
- Splash screen wording and Icons
-
Jean-marie: decision on memory
- Josh: 1Gb on all client / platforms for insight?
- Jean-Marie: let the user increase as they go, would require changes in the code, just the maximum size increased (x2)
- Jean-Marie: have to turn to back on server/client version checking
- Melissa: working on the 2 tickets, think they are under control.
Remaining rest -- Please clean up ASAP.
- Josh: clean these up in the next hour (hopefully)
Post release plans
-
Documentation 4.4.1 milestone
- Emma: a quick release over summer for September
- Josh: bugs that get submitted
- Josh: everyone wants to clean it up and redesign it. sit down next week list of things we want to do, sphinx?
- Josh: get notes under 4.4.1 so we can see the body of work we have to do
- Josh: we all need a better system, rather than the release process page
- Jean-Marie: plone / trac? doc we started to reorganise, sitemap / index.
- Josh: start moving everything to a new system, can’t complete that this summer, but a few things, like a download page etc in a month / month 1.5
- Jean-Marie: getting started page in sphinx?
- Emma: duplicated, edited, published things. Unmanageable mass of data. Be thinking of over the summer. Need to put more thought into it.
- Jean-Marie: easy to add to sphinx, danger again
- Emma: more about planning
- Andrew: annoying to have trac / plone different markup
- Will: that’s what we’ve done for trac
- Andrew: but many more for plone.
- Jean-Marie: first question is “do we need a paper copy”
- Andrew: also have schema from oxygen and slice/java/epydoc from build
- Josh: Anyone else?
- Jean-Marie: time to delete.
- Emma: delete. delete.
- Emma: also a good time for Liza to add a design. Mtg. with Scott & Gus
- Liza: need to set some time, because need to manage workflow around GS projs.
- Andrew: to also be included.
-
Beta decision
- Josh: unless there are objections, we will be dropping beta.
- Jean-Marie: worried, when we move to FS we change everything. That would be the time.
- Will: are we going to do this silently or make a big announcement that we’re bug-less?
-
Josh: I would say we mention in the announcement that it’s just no longer appropriate,
- but that the quality is still the same and there will still be big changes.
- Emma: motion passed, removal of beta
-
Documentation 4.4.1 milestone
Feedback from Paris [UX team] - 15:21 UK
- To be scoped: caching, archiving,
Glencoe Update - 15:38 UK
Any other business (<5 mins)
-
Jean-Marie: marie laurie in toulouse chat this morning, notes taken have some points, what they want to achieve and how they are testing the system
- Emma: match multiple levels of hierarchy in to 2
- Jean-Marie: funding is different, working on different sites
-
Scott: Question when nightshade will be upgraded?
- Chris: as soon as we release we can discuss, downtime is minimal, notify and upgrade everyone.
-
Jean-Marie: marie laurie in toulouse chat this morning, notes taken have some points, what they want to achieve and how they are testing the system