Personal tools
  • We're Hiring!

You are here: Home Community Minutes Conference Calls 2011 2011-02-01 Tuesday Meeting

2011-02-01 Tuesday Meeting

Attending: Brian, Ola, Will, Jean-Marie, Chris, Colin, Andrew, Melissa, Josh, Curtis, Jason, Carlos, Scott

Agenda

Remember: Agenda must be complete (with estimated times) on the day before the meeting. Any additions after that must go at the bottom (AOCB)

  1. Accepting minutes from last meeting

  2. Matters Arising (<10 mins)

    • Everyone: review/update "4.3+ Priorities" i.e. list of "big things" for next sprint review (reminder - added to agenda for Thursday)
    • Will: forward to list Jerome emails.
    • Ola: Work with Scott on web unification docs.
    • Donald: Talk to Jos about getting access (1/2 Doz. test accounts for Angus' lab)
    • Everyone: look at download pages from chris.
    • Everyone: week from Thursday, have "Bug:" tickets below 10!
      • Move them to stories with estimates
      • Or do the work.
      • Everyone: Sort out bugs that are too long / mislabled
    • Brian: Help forum "Scripting movie error'" (see above)
    • Jason: respond to forum "beginners and baby beginners"
    • Andrew: Send Jason some floorplan ideas
  3. Scott's presentation (via web) (45 mins)

  4. Any other business (<5 mins)

In Attendance

Brian, Ola, Will, Jean-Marie, Chris, Colin, Andrew, Melissa, Josh, Curtis, Jason, Carlos, Scott

Notes

  1. Matters Arising (<10 mins)

    • Everyone: review/update "4.3+ Priorities" i.e. list of "big things" for next sprint review (reminder - added to agenda for Thursday)
      • Holding off this conversation for Thursday on the End of the Sprint
    • Will: forward to list Jerome emails. - Done
    • Ola: Work with Scott on web unification docs. - Done
    • Donald: Talk to Jos about getting access (1/2 Doz. test accounts for Angus' lab) - Pendng
      • Jos is away
      • Working on gretzky
    • Everyone: look at download pages from chris. - Pending
      • Eveyrone still need to check this
    • Everyone: week from Thursday, have "Bug:" tickets below 10! - Ongoing
      • Move them to stories with estimates
      • Or do the work.
      • Everyone: Sort out bugs that are too long / mislabled
    • Brian: Help forum "Scripting movie error'" - Done
    • Jason: respond to forum "beginners and baby beginners" - Jason is in conversation so Ongoing
    • Andrew: Send Jason some floorplan ideas -
  2. Scott's presentation (via web) (45 mins)

    • Question from users: "why multiple clients" (from Paris, etc)
    • Jean-Marie: re-added some code for importing from inside insight
    • Trying to put a process in place for usability loopback
    • Goal is to better record and respond to user feedback
    • Jason: feedback (in tickets) needs to be clearly written.
    • Jean-Marie: that was mostly an early-stage of feedback. Improving.
    • Will: may get some good feedback from M. show video first.
    • Jean-Marie: finer granularity of tickets
      • cleaner, simpler, more obvious for users
      • feel more comfortable to get new versions in front of users.
      • easier to manage as a pair (Jean-Marie + Scott)
    • Jason
      • intense turn around on a feature in a 2 week sprint?
      • developer+functionality+user with some Scott glue?
      • Jean-Marie: other bits (model, etc.) can be involved
      • when it's time to get feedback, then enter into intense cycle
      • took 1/2 iteration too much
      • but if we say, screenshot or movie at end of iteration, will help
    • Jason: quick questions
      • what's the necessity or the role for the usability role?
      • Jean-Marie: few benefits
        • Another view other than the developers'
        • Having someone to run the sessions without dev present
        • Getting a large pool of users
      • Jason: key is physical/highly-interactive access to users
      • Jean-Marie: will need a similar phase when we get back to scripting
      • Can't demand too much time from users
      • Guidelines:
        • "short meetings", "immediate feedback", "small/focus tasks",...
        • don't implement everything right away
      • Chris: big issue
        • we shouldn't be developing new features without strong feedback loop
        • i.e. look for the best people when working on new features.
        • Brian: but we got this far without the process
      • Jean-Marie: probably didn't take enough screenshots as we were going.
    • Chris: would be interesting to see how this applies to prioritization of features
      • Brian: same process to documentation. What do you want to read?
      • Scott: also can be used among developers
    • Chris: should be careful to not be influencing too heavily the workflow
  3. Any other business (<5 mins)

    • Chris: Permissions/data visibility thread had some interesting comments
      • Will, Carlos, Jason, Ola, Chris
      • "I'm an admin, I want to see everyone's data"
      • Jay has a similar requirement, but for collaboration
      • Permissions II for 4.3?
      • Jean-Marie: not many big images labs since OMERO hasn't worked for them previously
      • Josh: if we go down the permissions route again, it may affect Big Images timelines
    • Ola: Google search engine does not find our website
      • "omero demo server" turns up little, or the dead blog
      • Chris: anyone who uses google docs gets trash results
      • Ola: Finding OMERO.blog (which is horribly out of date)
      • Andrew: Plone fragements urls a lot
      • Brian: all for consolidation.
  4. Actions

    • Jean-Marie & Scott: put together guidelines for the team (see above)
    • Andrew: move big ticket review to the next Thursday
    • Andrew: push "pending" tasks
    • Everyone: Give feedback to Chris about omero/downloads page
    • Everyone: Look over bugs! Lots of old ones tha need to be fixed/remove/cleaned up
      • Anything over 2 weeks should be handled.
    • Everyone: opinions on blog for Thursday. Decision will be made.
Document Actions