We're Hiring!

Bug: adding ModuloAlongT interferes with LightPath metadata

Historical discussions about the Bio-Formats library. Please look for and ask new questions at https://forum.image.sc/tags/bio-formats
Please note:
Historical discussions about the Bio-Formats library. Please look for and ask new questions at https://forum.image.sc/tags/bio-formats

If you are having trouble with image files, there is information about reporting bugs in the Bio-Formats documentation. Please send us the data and let us know what version of Bio-Formats you are using. For issues with your code, please provide a link to a public repository, ideally GitHub.

Bug: adding ModuloAlongT interferes with LightPath metadata

Postby gyellen » Tue Oct 28, 2014 9:24 pm

Hi -
I have found that adding an image annotation (in this case a ModuloAlongT annotation) interferes with subsequent function of setLightPathDichroicRef and setLightPathEmissionFilterRef, not only for the annotated image series but for subsequent series.

It works fine if I first do the setLightPathEmissionFilterRef, etc., and put off the call to OMEXMLService.addModuloAlong(metadata, coreMetadata, series);
until all other metadata are written.

Thanks - gary
gyellen
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 1:19 am

Re: Bug: adding ModuloAlongT interferes with LightPath metad

Postby sbesson » Wed Oct 29, 2014 11:57 am

Hi Gary,

Thanks for letting us know. Could you upload or attach the code that you used to generate the image with annotations?

Sebastien
User avatar
sbesson
Team Member
 
Posts: 421
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:20 pm


Return to User Discussion [Legacy]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest